Sign in Subscribe
Featured

Why price liquidity matters for Evolve’s ETHR ETF

Only Evolve Ether ETF, which uses the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate as its reference index, is backed by a pricing source with a fully public and transparent methodology.

Ken Odeluga

• 5 min read
Why price liquidity matters for Evolve’s ETHR ETF

Evolve ETHR’s NAV is calculated with CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate, the most liquid, regulated Ether price

Screenshot-2021-04-17-at-12.23.09-4
Ether ETFs flow
It’s a testament to Canada’s progressive institutional investment market that the first three Ether ETFs in the world were approved by the Ontario Securities Commission earlier this month, with all three beginning to trade this week.

It’s also another positive signal for the cryptoasset class as the pace of breakthroughs appears to accelerate. Just weeks ago, ETFs investing in the preeminent digital asset, Bitcoin, didn’t exist. Now, several exist, with four in Canada alone and the first-ever crypto portfolio ETF, Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto ETF, whose reference index is devised and managed by CF Benchmarks, trading on the Bermuda Stock Exchange.

This flurry of launches points to significant institutional investor demand—often reflective of consumer demand—for the simplified and most importantly, regulated, structure of ETFs as vehicles for crypto investment.

Competition follows
The other side of that demand is competition. And competition has been very much in evidence this week. Apart from the willingness of those Ether ETF sponsors to go head-to-head with each other by launching on the same day, this week saw a set of fee reductions—quite like the ones seen when Bitcoin ETFs began trading. First, Evolve announced that it would waive the management fee of its Ether ETF (TSX ticker: ETHR) until May 31st. A day later, CI Global Asset Management swiftly followed by slapping a “zero” management fee on its CI Galaxy Ethereum ETF till June 15th. CI’s fund was initially announced with a 0.4% fee. That left only the Purpose Ether ETF retaining its launch fee of 1% at the time of writing.

Commercial competition is healthy from a client perspective if it reduces client costs. Lower fees can, however, sometimes cloud other just-as-important factors that prospective ETF clients need to consider when choosing which one to invest in.

What price of Ether
One of the most critical is highlighted by the differing approaches to reference pricing and net asset value (NAV) adopted by Ether ETF sponsors. Purpose Ether ETF uses the TradeBlock ETX Index to calculate NAV. CI Galaxy Ethereum ETF’s holdings are priced by the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum Index.

Only Evolve Ether ETF, which uses the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate (ETHUSD_RR) as its reference index, is backed by a pricing source with a fully public and transparent methodology; and whose market integrity, representativeness and replicability have been demonstrated by published quantitative research.

A related ETHUSD_RR factor that’s just as critical is price liquidity. The preeminent block of assets referencing ETHUSD_RR are the CME Group’s Ether Futures, the only CFTC-regulated Ether futures contract. Between their launch, on February 8th, and a snapshot on April 7th, CME ETH futures grew by a total of 34,000 contracts traded, averaging 820 contracts per day. That’s equivalent to 41,000 Ether daily, or about 1.7 million Ether over the roughly 8-week stretch.

Of course, it’s still literally early days for CME Ether Futures.

Understandably, CME Ether Futures open interest (OI)—the number of unsettled contracts opened on the exchange and hence a broader indication of volume—lags open interest on other large crypto futures exchanges, as shown in the chart from skewAnalytics below. (Figure 1).

Figure 1: ETH Futures Open Interest on major exchanges as of April 20, 2021skew_exchange_eth_futures_open_interest_bnSource: skewAnalytics

Crucially however, none of the CME’s rival large exchanges are CFTC-regulated. As such, given that institutional participants are obliged to transact futures only at regulated marketplaces, the assumption is that CME Group crypto open interest represents the most accurate gauge of institutional crypto derivative market activity.

That puts the rise of CME ETH open interest to $220m this week, from a standing start, into context.

Put another way, as far as the institutional Ether futures market goes, certainly in the U.S., CME Ether Futures are the Ether futures market.

Likewise, it follows that CME Ether Futures should also be the most significant section of the ETH futures market as regards institutional investment in the underlying asset.

On that basis, it’s instructive to compare CME Ether open interest, with open interest in the group’s flagship crypto contract, Bitcoin Futures. (See Figure 2.)

Figure 2: BTC Futures Open Interest on major exchanges as of April 20, 2021skew_exchange_btc_futures_open_interest_bnSource: skewAnalytics

From a position towards the lower end of market share around a year ago, CME BTC open interest has regularly vied for the top spot over the last couple of quarters, and currently stands in third place. That’s compelling volume growth.

The rise looks partly due to CME Bitcoin Futures being among the best established BTC futures, having been launched late in 2017. Additionally, with end-to-end regulation of CME Bitcoin Futures (including their settlement index, the CME CF BRR) there’s no question that CME BTC is among the most appropriate markets for institutional participants—another explanation of CME BTC’s rapid growth.

A fair takeaway for CME ETH Futures open interest then, is that growth should steadily increase from here, a notion backed by data showing CME ETH open interest growing faster relative to CME BTC open interest. (Figure 3).

Figure 3: ETH/BTC Average Daily Volume (ADV) ratio vs. ETH/BTC Average Daily Open Interest (ADOI)CME_Ether_to_Bitcoin_charts_640x360Source: CME Group

The growing liquidity of assets referencing the ETHUSD_RR has further implications, bearing in mind the importance of both overall market liquidity and the representative liquidity of individual assets. (There’s a quick refresher at the link).

Note that CME Ether futures surpassed $160m in terms of weekly trading volume in their first week of trading. Equivalent weekly volume was around $410m by April 7th, based on the ETHUSD_RR index price of $2,003.93 on that day.

All told, the ample and almost certainly growing liquidity of Ether at the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate price, implies an edge of superior market efficiency for assets priced with the ETHUSD_RR, including Evolve Ether ETF.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.

CF Benchmarks Ltd (“CF Benchmarks”), a company registered in England and Wales with company number 11654816 and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Information about us can be found on the Financial Services Register (register number 847100).

Registered Office: 6th Floor One London Wall, London, United Kingdom, EC2Y 5EB.

You agree not to, and have no rights to, use the CF Benchmarks Data to create, calculate, issue, settle, maintain, support or develop any financial instruments (including but, without limitation exchange traded products, certificates, warrants, contracts for difference, swaps, binary options, structured products), indices, products, services (including but without limitation, portfolio management services, pre- and post-trade risk management services, or valuation services) or any other derivative works without the express written consent of CF Benchmarrks.

You agree not to analyze, reverse-engineer or disassemble any CF Benchmarks data and not to insert any code or product to manipulate the Website content in any way that affects any user’s experience. Unless CF Benchmarks gives you prior written permission, use of any Web browsers (other than generally available third-party browsers), engines, scripts, software, spiders, robots, avatars, agents, tools or other devices or mechanisms (such as crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or other technology) to navigate, access, copy in bulk, retrieve, harvest, index, search or analyse any portion of the Website is strictly prohibited.

No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of CF Benchmarks Ltd. Use and distribution of the CF Benchmarks data requires a license from CF Benchmarks or its authorized licensing agents.

All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained on this website is obtained by CF Benchmarks, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.

CF Benchmarks, nor its directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or implied, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of the CF Benchmarks indices or the fitness or suitability of the same indices for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through CF Benchmarks indices is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

No responsibility or liability can be accepted by CF Benchmarks nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this website or links to this website.

CF Benchmarks and its respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors do not provide investment advice and nothing accessible through CF Benchmarks, should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice or a financial promotion. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of any assets.

CF Benchmarks is a member of the Crypto Facilities group of companies which is in turn a member of the Payward, Inc. group of companies. Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Kraken Exchange, a venue that facilitates the trading of cryptocurrencies. The Kraken Exchange is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices. Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Staked, a venue that operates the block production nodes for decentralized PoS protocols on behalf of institutional investors. Staked.us is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.

Please refer to the individual product family documentation for more information about applicable input data sources.