Sign in Subscribe
bitcoin Featured

SEC rewinds more Bitcoin ETF reviews

The SEC is continuing to take its time to decide whether or not to (finally) approve one of the weighty Bitcoin ETF applications on its desk.

Ken Odeluga

• 3 min read
SEC rewinds more Bitcoin ETF reviews
US Security and Exchange Commission Office photo Don Ramey Logan.jpg from Wikimedia Commons by Don Ramey Logan, CC-BY 4.0

Valkyrie and Kryptoin join WisdomTree with 45-day review extensions

It’s time for another update on the state of play of current U.S. Bitcoin ETF applications, with a focus on the four filings that include one of CF Benchmarks’ regulated Bitcoin indices.

The SEC’s latest delayed Bitcoin ETF decisions

  1. Late on Wednesday, Valkyrie’s Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund (which will use the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate to calculate NAV) became the latest crypto ETF filing to the SEC to have its decision date pushed back. The ‘notice of a proposed rule change’ that customarily kicked off the commission’s initial 45-day review period was published on 12th May, indicating 26th June as the previous decision deadline. The new deadline following the commission’s latest extension is designated as 10th August
  2. The commission extended its review period for Kryptoin’s Kryptoin Bitcoin ETF Trust (which will use the CF Bitcoin-Dollar US Settlement Price for NAV calculation) for 45 days on 9th June, following its acknowledgement of a ‘proposed rule change’ on 28th April. The 45-day review period extension began on 12th June, giving the SEC a new deadline of 27th July to decide on whether to approve or disapprove of the application
  3. For the second time, the SEC has extended its review period for VanEck’s VanEck Bitcoin Trust, having done so first in April, at that time giving itself 45 days ending on 17th June to come to a decision. The new 45-day review period should create a new deadline of 1st August, though that date wasn’t confirmed in the latest SEC notice on VanEck’s application.

The most interesting aspect of the document is that the SEC also used it to instigate a call for public comment, to “determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved.” Whilst such calls are a routine measure in the commission’s toolbox when deciding on filings, they do indicate that the decision-making process is progressing to its next stage. Even so, as the notice points out, “Institution of (such) proceedings does not indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with respect to any of the issues involved.”

All in, the SEC is continuing to take its time to decide whether or not to (finally) approve one of the weighty Bitcoin ETF applications on its desk. It’s worth noting that to date, the commission has availed itself of its full procedural prerogative to extend review periods for almost all Bitcoin ETF applications filed over the last five years.

As such, the latest delays, are disappointing, to be sure, but not surprising. After all, the importance of an eventual ‘yes’ decision from the regulator is as widely recognised as the objections the SEC and other establishment institutions have had about Bitcoin over the years. True, many of these objections remain justified, yet many are now less relevant; with several key risks and concerns having been either demonstrably obviated or, mitigated down to the same level inherent in other risky asset classes, like stocks and commodities.

It appears that it will simply take time for the regulatory apparatus to satisfy itself that those key concerns really have been dealt with. All told, it would be quite cogent for the SEC’s Bitcoin ETF decision-making processes to be one of the most long-winded ones it has ever undertaken. Bearing in mind the protocol for 45-day extensions up to a total permitted review period of 240 days since publication of ‘proposed rule change’ notices, delayed decisions on the 8 most prominent Bitcoin ETF filings on the slate right now could potentially extend the waiting game well into 2022.

Meanwhile, as we’ve noted in recent weeks, logically, these delays in themselves have no objective bearing one way or another on the likelihood of whether or not a U.S. Bitcoin ETF will (eventually) receive regulatory approval. Though they may be frustrating!

For Bitcoin ETF applications supported by one or more of CF Benchmarks’ regulated Benchmark indices our updated summary of timelines and currently expected decision dates is below.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.

CF Benchmarks Ltd (“CF Benchmarks”), a company registered in England and Wales with company number 11654816 and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Information about us can be found on the Financial Services Register (register number 847100).

Registered Office: 6th Floor One London Wall, London, United Kingdom, EC2Y 5EB.

You agree not to, and have no rights to, use the CF Benchmarks Data to create, calculate, issue, settle, maintain, support or develop any financial instruments (including but, without limitation exchange traded products, certificates, warrants, contracts for difference, swaps, binary options, structured products), indices, products, services (including but without limitation, portfolio management services, pre- and post-trade risk management services, or valuation services) or any other derivative works without the express written consent of CF Benchmarrks.

You agree not to analyze, reverse-engineer or disassemble any CF Benchmarks data and not to insert any code or product to manipulate the Website content in any way that affects any user’s experience. Unless CF Benchmarks gives you prior written permission, use of any Web browsers (other than generally available third-party browsers), engines, scripts, software, spiders, robots, avatars, agents, tools or other devices or mechanisms (such as crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or other technology) to navigate, access, copy in bulk, retrieve, harvest, index, search or analyse any portion of the Website is strictly prohibited.

No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of CF Benchmarks Ltd. Use and distribution of the CF Benchmarks data requires a license from CF Benchmarks or its authorized licensing agents.

All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained on this website is obtained by CF Benchmarks, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.

CF Benchmarks, nor its directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or implied, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of the CF Benchmarks indices or the fitness or suitability of the same indices for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through CF Benchmarks indices is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

No responsibility or liability can be accepted by CF Benchmarks nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this website or links to this website.

CF Benchmarks and its respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors do not provide investment advice and nothing accessible through CF Benchmarks, should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice or a financial promotion. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of any assets.

CF Benchmarks is a member of the Crypto Facilities group of companies which is in turn a member of the Payward, Inc. group of companies. Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Kraken Exchange, a venue that facilitates the trading of cryptocurrencies. The Kraken Exchange is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices. Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Staked, a venue that operates the block production nodes for decentralized PoS protocols on behalf of institutional investors. Staked.us is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.

Please refer to the individual product family documentation for more information about applicable input data sources.