BlackRock’s Bitcoin Private Trust is set to speed up regulation, competition and price integrity
BlackRock’s just-launched BlackRock Bitcoin Private Trust, provides a fresh focus for institutional crypto market interest, and further potential impetus for the ongoing recovery of the digital asset class (as outlined this week by CF Benchmarks’ Lead Research Analyst, Gabe Selby, CFA.)
Regardless of the short-term market and industry reaction though, this watershed news will almost certainly turn out to be a critical juncture for the development of the institutional digital asset space that CF Benchmarks addresses.
As such, we believe it’s important to highlight some of the high-level implications of the news.
Let’s begin with a summary of key details:
- BlackRock Inc.’s BlackRock Bitcoin Private Trust is available for institutional clients only
- For the first time, BlackRock will offer direct BTC exposure via the trust, tracking the spot price of the largest cryptoasset
- The asset manager said it’s “still seeing substantial interest from some institutional clients in how to efficiently and cost-effectively access” Bitcoin, despite this year’s crypto market downturn
- BlackRock highlights the importance of sustainable energy usage in Bitcoin mining, saying it’s “encouraged” by developments in that direction amid the hotly debated topic of Bitcoin’s environmental impact
Next, we highlight some of the clearest takeaways below:
The increasing institutionalisation of cryptoasset investing, of which BlackRock Bitcoin Private Trust is both representative of and will probably be an additional catalyst for, is among the easiest observations.
This month has seen Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF begin trading; FTSE 100-listed investment group Abdrn bought a stake in Archax, a regulated digital assets exchange; whilst another UK-based firm, Schroders, completed a crypto-flavoured buy-in too.
These moves come on top of intensifying adoption trends among Wall Street banks and those elsewhere in the global financial system, as well as by a broader range of institutional participants.
Just days ago, BlackRock itself announced a partnership with Coinbase that aims to provide a smoother on-ramp for institutional management and trading of Bitcoin.
The fact that this is all occurring after crypto’s biggest market price correction since the COVID-19 pandemic crash is a strong indicator of the appetite of product providers that’s in turn being driven by client demand.
And this interest among institutions—including the presence of the dominant global asset manager, BlackRock—is self-evidently continuing through the asset price cycle, underlying the resilience of the industry and continuing to underscore the longevity of the asset class.
Of course, it’s also possible that the news may help to precipitate improved market sentiment that can solidify the apparent recent development of a floor under crypto prices.
BlackRock’s private Bitcoin trust is also the latest reminder of the global divide between regulatory clarity and client and institutional demand that’s been a serious, though clearly not terminal, impediment to adoption growth.
However, BlackRock’s dominance of the U.S. investment product market—for instance a 33.4% share of ETFs—plus, the ubiquity of its unified risk analytics, portfolio management, and trading platform, Aladdin, indicate higher implied pressure on regulators to accelerate the development of formal supervisory and guidance frameworks.
The SEC has no obligation to expedite that process, of course, but the disparate development of U.S. regulatory conditions relative to institutional demand and participation in digital assets is now further underscored.
We should also consider the potential positive impact on the growth of sustainable Bitcoin mining trends from BlackRock’s entrance into the spot Bitcoin investment product market, due to its sheer size.
As the preeminent protagonist of ESG investing, BlackRock made clear in its announcement that it seeks to accelerate the transition to a higher proportion of ‘clean energy’ usage among miners.
Given that the group is, in effect, the largest investing entity across dozens of industries, it is uniquely well placed to bring such a switch about, particularly amid signs that renewable forms of energy remain among the cheapest forms.
BlackRock Bitcoin Private Trust enters a marketplace for institutional Bitcoin investment products that is in fact already highly developed.
Chief among these products is Grayscale’s GBTC, with AuM currently standing at $15bn. GBTC has long faced criticism for, among other things, a relatively high expense ratio (current annual fee: 2%).
BlackRock’s investment management scale translates to among the lowest Net Expense Ratios (NER) among several ETF categories.
Although it’s difficult to accurately transpose that tendency to a private fund that invests in Bitcoin, at the very least, increased competition in the Bitcoin institutional fund market probably bodes well for reduced client expenses.
Last, but certainly not least of the potential implications of BlackRock’s deepened involvement in the institutional cryptoasset management space comes from CF Benchmark’s perspective as a UK FCA regulated Benchmark Administrator.
(Note that UK Benchmark Regulation has official equivalence to EU BMR and in principle alignment with globally recognised tenets of price integrity.)
Unsurprisingly, BlackRock as a group typically stresses the highest possible standards of market integrity, encompassing transparency, investor protection and the responsible growth of capital markets.
These standards resonate with the stringent policies and principles of price integrity that CF Benchmarks is obliged as a UK FCA regulated Benchmark Administrator to uphold.
As such, the likely coalescence of the institutional asset management industry—led by groups like BlackRock—around end-to-end market integrity, including pricing sources for which CF Benchmarks is the market leader, ought to streamline the path of regulatory developments.
In turn this should strengthen investor confidence in digital assets.
The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.